Journal of Mining Engineering

Journal of Mining Engineering

EVALUATION OF DIAMOND WIRE SAW PRODUCTION RATE RESPONSE TO ROCK GEOMECHANICAL PARAMETERS

Document Type : research - paper

Authors
Associate Professor, Faculty of Industrial and Mining Technologies, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran
Abstract
The sawability of diamond wire saws is a critical factor in the planning and optimization of stone quarry operations. Previous research has proposed both linear and non-linear models to estimate production rate—a key measure of sawability—based on geomechanical and machine parameters.

This study investigates the performance of diamond wire saws in cutting carbonate rocks by analyzing production rates across 14 different carbonate rock samples from various Iranian quarries. Earlier studies have incorporated parameters such as uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian tensile strength (BTS), Schmidt hammer rebound value, Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) resistance, and production rate to model sawability.

In this research, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to evaluate the influence of independent variables on production rate. Statistical error analysis comparing predicted and actual production rates demonstrated that the RSM-based quadratic model outperformed other models, exhibiting the lowest values of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), variance of absolute relative error (VARE), median absolute error (MEDAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), along with the highest value of variance accounted for (VAF).

Furthermore, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed that the Los Angeles abrasion value has the most significant impact on production rate. Based on comprehensive statistical evaluation, the developed RSM-based quadratic model provides a reliable and accurate method for predicting the production rate of diamond wire saws in carbonate rock cutting
Keywords

Subjects


 Jain, S. and S. Rathore (2009). Role of cut size area on the performance of diamond wire saw machine in quarrying of marble, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 23(2): p. 79-91.
## Jain, S. and S. Rathore (2011). Prediction of cutting performance of diamond wire saw machine in quarrying of marble: a neural network approach, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 44(3): p. 367-371.
## Ataei, M., et al. (2012). Predicting the production rate of diamond wire saw using statistical analysis, Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 5(6): p. 1289-1295.
## Yılmaz, N.G., R. Goktan, and Y. Kibici (2011). An investigation of the petrographic and physico-mechanical properties of true granites influencing diamond tool wear performance, and development of a new wear index, Wear. 271(5): p. 960-969.
 ## Sadegheslam, G., et al. (2013). Predicting the production rate of diamond wire saws using multiple nonlinear regression analysis, Geosystem Engineering. 16(4): p. 275-285.
 ## Ozcelik, Y.; 1999; Investigation of the working conditions of diamond wire cutting machines in marble industry. PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara (in Turkish).
 ## Farooq Anjum, M., I. Tasadduq, and K. Al-Sultan (1997). Response surface methodology: A neural network approach, European Journal of Operational Research. 101(1): p. 65-73.
 ## Kwak, J.-S. (2005). Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 45(3): p. 327-334.
## Baş, D. and İ.H. Boyacı (2007). Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, Journal of Food Engineering. 78(3): p. 836-845.
## مردعلی زاده, م., م.ر. سلیمانی یزدی و م. صفرخانیان (2014). مدلسازی تجربی و بررسی تاثیر پارامترهای فرایند جوشکاری اصطکاکی اختلاطی آلیاژ آلومینیوم5456 با استفاده از روش سطح پاسخ, مدل سازی در مهندسی. 12(38): 103-116.
 ## مختاریان اصل, م. و ع. علی پور (2018). مدل‌سازی نرخ نفوذ دستگاه تمام مقطع مکانیزه حفر تونل به روش سطح پاسخ, مدل سازی در مهندسی. 16(55): 24-30.
## نیکوئی ماهانی, م., ا. محمودزاد، و م. امامقلی بابادی (2018). تولید نمونه های تصادفی بدون نیاز به پارامترهای توزیع با استفاده از روش سطح پاسخ, مدل سازی در مهندسی.  16(54): 10-20. ##

  • Receive Date 19 May 2025
  • Revise Date 23 September 2025
  • Accept Date 19 August 2025