Evaluation of acid mine drainage forming potential of a low-grade copper waste dump of Miduk mine according to chemical static methods, mineralogical studies and multivariate statistical analyses

Document Type : research - paper

Authors

1 School of Mining, College of Engineering, University of Tehran

2 school of mining, college of engineering, university of tehran

3 Hydrometallurgy Research and Development Centre, Share Babak Copper Complex, Miduk Copper Mine, Kerman, Iran

4 Leaching Division, Share Babak Copper Complex, Miduk Copper Mine, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

The oxidation of sulphide minerals especially pyrite is the main source of acid production in mine waste rocks. Other sulphide minerals including chalcopyrite, covellite, and galena may be also responsible for acid production. Huge waste rock dumps with high sulphide content may generate acidic drainages as a result of oxidation and hydrolysis processes. Accordingly, acid production and neutralization potential of waste rocks were evaluated based on common Acid-Base Accounting (ABA) and Net Acid Generation (NAG) methods at dump No.7 from Miduk Mine. The results of chemical methods were compared with the mineralogical studies. Mineralogical analyses including X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron probe micro analysis (EPMA) were employed to comprehensively study primary sulphides and secondary minerals. There was a strong possibility to generate acid mine drainage (AMD) with very high metal content in dump No. 7. According to the results of NAPP and NAG pH, all samples were classified as potential acid forming (PAF). The lowest and the highest NAPP were determined in samples HB1 and HC1S with values 200.08 and 654.14 kgH2SO4/t. Regarding paste pH and NAG pH classification, all samples were categorised as extremely acid forming (EAF) and acid forming (AF) groups. Due to high pyrite oxidation, the portion of sulphate sulphur was ranged between 1.28 and 7.28 wt. According to both hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA), pH has an important role in the dissolution of waste materials. In addition, there was a strong positive correlation between Fe, Pb and As indicating the fact that they may have the same secondary mineral source in the soluble phase of the wastes. The results of the present study could be applied in the prediction of AMD generation and mine waste management.

Keywords

References

منابع
1 . دولتی اردهجانی، فرامرز؛ شفائی سید ضیاالدین؛ میر
حبیبی علی؛ بدیعی خشایار؛ 1384 ؛ “بیوتکنولوژی،
ژئوشیمی زیستمحیطی و مدیریت پسابها”،
پژوهشکده صنایع رنگ، تهران، جلد اول.
2. Nordstrom D. K.; 2011; “Mine waters: acidic to circumneutral”, Elements, 7, 393-398.
3. Manchisi J. ; Hansford G. S.; Gaylard P.; Simukanga S.; Nyirenda R. L.; Sichalwe A.; 2012; “Potential for bioleaching copper sulphide rougher concentrates of Nchanga Mine, Chingola, Zambia”, The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 112, 1051-1058.
4. Dold B.; 2017; “Acid rock drainage prediction: A critical review”, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 172, 120–132.
5. Jamieson H. E.; Walker S. R.; Parsons M. B.; 2015; “Mineralogical characterization of mine waste”, Applied Geochemistry, 57, 85-105.
6. Chopard A., Benzaazoua M., Bouzahzah H., Plante B., Marion P.; 2017; “A contribution to improve the calculation of the acid generating potential of mining wastes”, Chemosphere, 175, 97-107.
7. Tremblay G. A.; Hogan C. M.; 2001; “Mine environment neutral drainage (MEND) manual 5.4.2d: prevention and control”, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa.
8. Bouzahzah H.; Benzaazoua M.; Bussiere B.; Plante B.; “Prediction of acid mine drainage: Importance of mineralogy and the test protocols for static and kinetic tests”, Mine Water and the Environment 33, 54-65.
9. Shahhoseiny, M.; Doulati Ardejani, F.; Shafaei, S.Z.; Noaparast, M.; Hamidi, D.; 2013; “Geochemical and Mineralogical Characterization of a Pyritic Waste Pile at the Anjir Tangeh Coal Washing Plant, Zirab, Northern Iran”,. Mine Water and the Environment, 32, 84–96.
10. Sobek, A.A.; Schuller, W.A.; Freeman, J.R.; Smith, R.M.; 1978; “Field and Laboratory Methods Applicable to Overburdens and Minesoils”, Environmental Protection Technology Series EPA-6002-78-054.
11. Stewart, W.S.; Miller, S.D.; Smart, R.; 2006; “Advances in acid rock drainage (ARD)characterisation of mine wastes”, In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, pp. 2098-2119.
12. Plante, B.; Bussiere, B.; Benzaazoua, M.; 2012; “Static tests response on 5 Canadian hard rock mine tailings with low net acid-generating potentials”, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 114, 57-69.
13. Abrosimova N.; Gaskova O.; Loshkareva A.; Edelev A,; Bortnikova S.; 2015; “Assessment of the acid mine drainage potential of waste rocks at the Ak-Sug porphyry Cu-Mo deposit”, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 157, 1-14.
14. Çelebi, E. E.; Oncel, M. S.; 2016; “Determination of acid forming potential of massive sulfide minerals and the tailings situated in lead/zinc mining district of Balya (NW Turkey)”, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 124, 487-496.
15. Vithana, C. L.; Sullivan, L. A.; Bush, R. T.; Burton, E. D.; 2014; “Jarosite quantification in soils: An enhanced sequential extraction procedure”, Applied Geochemistry, 51, 130–138.
16. INAP; 2009; The International Network for Acid Prevention. Global Acid Rock Drainage Guide (GARD Guide). <http://www.gardguide.com/>.
17. Price, W. A.; 2009; “Prediction Manual for Drainage Chemistry from Sulphidic Geologic Materials: Mine Environment Neutral
» مهندسی معدن « ارزیابی پتانسیل تولید زهاب اسیدی بر اساس روشهای استاتیک در یکی از انباشتههای… نشریه علمی پژوهشی
81
Journal of Mining Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 43
November 2019
Pages 81-66

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 November 2018
  • Revise Date: 18 April 2019
  • Accept Date: 16 September 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics